At this point, I don’t even care who’s behind these arson attacks anymore. Whether it’s angry individuals, bad actors, opportunists, or something more complicated—there’s one thing that’s become crystal clear to me as of 4/15/26:
This shit is anti-worker. Straight up.
Yeah, I said it.
Because let’s stop dancing around it and just say what’s actually happening. When you target warehouses—places like those run by Amazon or any other company—you are not striking some abstract symbol of capitalism. You are targeting a workplace.
A workplace.
That means people work there. Real people. Workers. The very same group that these actions are supposedly meant to defend or avenge.
And what happens when you burn a workplace down?
People lose their jobs.
It’s really that simple.
You’re not just damaging a building—you’re wiping out income for hundreds, sometimes thousands of workers. You’re cutting off their ability to pay rent, buy food, support their families. You’re throwing them into uncertainty, stress, and financial instability.
How is that pro-worker?
It’s not.
It’s the exact opposite.
And that’s before we even get into the part that should honestly be the most obvious and the most alarming: warehouses are not empty. They are active environments. There are people inside them at all hours—day shifts, night shifts, security, logistics, drivers coming in and out.
So when you set a fire in a place like that, you are not just risking property damage. You are putting lives on the line.
You are creating a situation where someone could get trapped, injured, or killed.
Workers.
Not CEOs. Not executives sitting in some distant office. Workers.
The same people you claim to be standing up for.
That contradiction is so massive that I don’t understand how anyone can look at this and still frame it as some kind of justice or resistance. Because if your actions directly harm the people you say you care about—if they take away their jobs, threaten their safety, and destabilize their lives—then your actions are not aligned with your stated values.
They’re just not.
And I think this is where a lot of people need to take a step back and really think about what “pro-worker” actually means. It’s not just about being angry at corporations. It’s not just about opposing wealth or power structures. It’s about materially improving the lives of working people.
Burning down their workplaces does the opposite.
It makes their lives harder. It puts them in danger. It strips away their stability.
That’s not solidarity.
That’s harm.
And honestly, calling this out shouldn’t be controversial. It shouldn’t get you labeled or dismissed or attacked. It should be common sense. You should be able to say, “I support workers” and “I oppose arson attacks on workplaces” in the same breath without anyone acting like that’s a contradiction.
Because it’s not.
If anything, those two positions go hand in hand.
So yeah—regardless of motives, regardless of narratives, regardless of who people want to blame or defend—this needs to be said plainly:
Arson against workplaces is anti-worker.
Not complicated. Not nuanced. Not up for spin.
Just the truth.